LLMs allow a new medium for communication.
LLMs allow a new medium for communication. Don't use LLMs to write books. Books are a static communication medium, one-size-fits-all, frozen for all time....
1,598 mentions · 615 chunks · 117 episodes
LLMs allow a new medium for communication. Don't use LLMs to write books. Books are a static communication medium, one-size-fits-all, frozen for all time....
Working with LLMs is like working with a recently tamed animal[agu].
Are you using LLMs right? The test is, are you thinking more or less? If you give its answer directly to others (without curation), you are giving an average, eroding y...
A nice piece from my friend Dimitri about two patterns for using LLMs. One pattern is the open-ended conversation. One is a recipe for generating insight from interactions.
What would an OS look like that took LLMs for granted? Not a patch job on top of the OSes we have today, but a new kind of "OS" that was AI-native, and built in a world that assumed high-qual...
... talking to a person, but talking to the collective hive mind of humanity.[ajm] LLMs give great guacamole recipes, because they've seen every guacamole recipe and can triangulate what they all have in common.
People who think LLMs can't be useful either haven't tried them or aren't curious enough. Curious people (especially ones with a need for cognition[ajv][ajw]) will keep pu...
...ge evaporates. Prompt-fu is the equivalent for getting much better results from LLMs. That implies that people with prompt-fu will get less and less differentiated results as the systems we all use get more mature. But presumably ther...
...y do a surprisingly great job at predicting what a given sequence will fold to. LLMs are tapping into a hidden structure of the universe that reveals itself only if you are patient enough to sift through it.[akb][akc] LLMs are patient...
There are a lot of new techniques to "frack" LLMs to squeeze more out of them. If you get just a single english-language append-only log designed for a human, you make the LLM take its rich understan...
You can view LLMs as a lemon to squeeze. The quality of an LLM's juice is tied to who is doing the squeezing. An implication of all outputs from LLMs being co-created ...
...ference time has wildly different characteristics. But a lot of discourse about LLMs doesn't differentiate the two. I see even technical people muddle this all the time. There's a difference between an LLM in training absorbing a holo...
...viders to electricity providers. Capital intensive, but commodity. But actually LLMs are a worse business than electricity providers[ako]. Electricity providers typically have a geographic monopoly; end consumers only have one option ...
Someone got an LLM to create a pretty good stand-up routine for other LLMs. My first reaction was: wow, the LLM is pretty funny! But I realize that that's partially an illusion. The LLM, working in tandem with the human, is ...
The append-only conversation log to interact with LLMs leaves me wanting more. In the past few months I've had a number of revelatory, multi-hour conversations with LLMs where I explore and pull on thread...
Interacting with LLMs today is like doing computing before the GUI.[ami] Clear raw potential that it takes specialist skills to unlock and apply. The command line was a re...
A nice little use for LLMs: discovering best practices. For example, download three different popular templates for Project Management from Notion, and provide them to the LLM,...
LLMs are unlike normal programs in that they allow open-ended output. Normal programs are close-ended[amm]: given similar inputs they will behave similarl...
An insightful quote from Ilya Sutskever via an old Less Wrong post about why LLMs are so powerful: "to learn to predict text, is to learn to predict the causal processes of which the text is a shadow,"[amo]
LLMs are the input to the next big thing.[amq] LLMs are like electricity[ams]: a general technology that reconfigures the costs of key inputs, making wild...