LLMs are society-scale intuition crystallized into a form you can easily talk to.
LLMs are society-scale intuition crystallized into a form you can easily talk to.
1,749 mentions · 790 chunks · 131 episodes
LLMs are society-scale intuition crystallized into a form you can easily talk to.
Turns out LLMs can help deprogram conspiracy beliefs by being extremely patient and knowledgeable. The asymmetry that it's easier to spread BS than to counteract it...
...the expert so often, so you had to develop the skill yourself. But now you have LLMs who are always patient and eager to help, and to just heroically give you the right answer. Ethan Mollick has noted that LLMs will break the implicit...
Using LLMs effectively today requires skill to know how to drive them effectively. But over time to become mass market it has to be a forgiving thing that anyon...
"have conversations with large amounts of data"is the key use case of LLMs. Computers are patient, but not subtle. Now LLMs learned how to be subtle and savvy, and they're still patient! Data doesn't know how to synthesize i...
...e? Computers! But computers aren't able to do synthesis. But now they can, with LLMs!
A domain where LLMs will be useful: where things haven't been tried because they'd take too much time and patience. For studying things within a discipline, where our ex...
Last week I asserted LLMs' superpower is translation. Compilers are a form of translation, too. Just a very specific, limited one. LLMs are notable in that they can do any tra...
LLMs are built for 4-up evolution UIs. That allow useful things to happen even for unreliable signals by allowing an intuitive and natural way for a human...
A friend who has been tinkering with LLMs reports if you tell them to act happy they're more likely to try things you tell them to. When you make the LLM more happy it's more willing to try n...
...ams Emerge from Simple Interaction From my summary in bits and bobs back then: "LLMs are not some party trick. They reveal something fundamental about humanity... and the universe."
Last week I asserted that a lot of usage of LLMs in organizations is illegible. Where the employee using the LLM has a reason to keep it illegible to their boss. A reason to stay illegible about you...
LLMs' superpower is translation, from anything to anything. A babelfish. Any translation task will be absorbed over time by LLMs. Lots of things can be fr...
...t intuition into an answer to a given problem in front of them. Not unlike what LLMs are doing. Though LLMs don't have a taste criteria for what to absorb from. Their sampling criterion is "things that humans decided to reproduce", wh...
LLMs today make boring mistakes because they can't learn. That is, the model's weights are fixed at training time. Some of the supporting systems around t...
...are hard. This is one of the reasons that unsupervised automation is tough with LLMs. Even if you get it to work well 95% of the time, that last 5% of reliability is extremely hard to achieve. If there's a human in the loop it doesn't...
Individuals are using LLMs way more effectively than organizations today. Individuals are using LLMs in situated contexts, informally and as augmentation to their work, not aut...
...itten in the LLM era will be smaller single files, not separations of concerns. LLMs do better with smaller files with all local context. Code that LLMs write will have this quality, and code that is written with LLMs in mind will als...
LLMs are inherently statistical summarizers. Which is why they pull to the centroid. "What is the most average answer, conditioned on the input so far?"
...bespoke, hand-crafted UI for that query cluster. But now you could do that with LLMs!