A system that has to coordinate within itself will be slow to build new use cases.

2024-05-27 · Bits and Bobs 5/27/24

It has to coordinate the components to a top-down conception of what should be done.

A swarm doesn't have a coherent vision of itself to coordinate to.

All of the coordination cost evaporates away.

For large systems the coordination cost is the vast majority of the cost to build something.

More on this topic

From other episodes

Centralization emerges, naturally, because bilateral coordination is super-linearly expensive.2026-04-13
What is the strategic staying power of our Google Accounts?2026-04-13
Coordination cost needs to be paid if there isn't a schelling point.2026-04-06
Asking for permission changes the coordination speed by an order of magnitude.2026-04-06
A lot of coordination costs inside of organizations are not about "is this a feature we want to support long term" but "is this worth even spending the time to think about?"2026-04-06
An open system that has meteoric growth is the best.2026-04-06
We think of computation as happening all at one layer of a system.2026-03-30
I was talking to a friend about an upcoming paper that digs into optimal organizations by experimenting with agent swarms.2026-03-30