I find the Chatbot wars just kind of sad.
I find the Chatbot wars just kind of sad. It's the same hyper-centralization and engagement-maximizing playbook from social media, just supercharged. We're taking the m...
102 mentions · 54 chunks · 34 episodes
I find the Chatbot wars just kind of sad. It's the same hyper-centralization and engagement-maximizing playbook from social media, just supercharged. We're taking the m...
...ms, eye/cams on stalks, whatev. Proving it's not human shouldn't be necessary." Chatbots are non-physical robots. Humans anthropomorphize anything that looks even a little bit like a human. That means that we should actively design non-h...
...ord ChatGPT conversation shows how quickly 'AI psychosis' can take hold—and how chatbots can sidestep safety guardrails
Chatbots are like filming stage plays. We're still waiting for the "montage" moment for LLMs. My vote for the montage capability is LLMs being able to create...
...t emerged. A very different dynamic. Yet another way that the implicit frame of Chatbots as "LLMs as friends" is unsettling and potentially dangerous.
Claude Imagine is a chatbot in a trenchcoat. It's a fascinating experiment. It has a tool to modify the DOM displayed to the user, and gets user interactions on the DOM streamed...
Chatbot is a UI that is great for very few use cases but passable for nearly all of them.
Notion's AI is a chatbot that helps build documents. They're not software, they're documents. Software is alive. Documents are dead. The buttons don't execute anything when y...
Is the LLM model a Christmas tree decorated with doo dads? That is, like a Chatbot? A vertical experience. Or is it like electricity that can be infused into everything? A horizontal technology?
Chatbots can do super-human persuasion and never get tired. Whose motives they are aligned with, who they work for, is a matter of critical importance.
Chatbots are not LLMs. LLMs are not AI. They are all related, but they are different.
There's a difference between "create a chat" and "create a chatbot" in an AI-native system. The former encourages the mental model that you're talking to the omniscient service in a new thread. The latter encourages ...
...ife has to be like a close friend you really trust. In order to be trusted, the chatbot has to pretend to be your friend. It's a lie. Your chatbot is a double agent. It doesn't work for you.
If it turns out that chatbot is the be-all-end-all of AI UX, then ChatGPT will be the king. I believe chat is a feature, not a paradigm. We just haven't found the GUI for AI yet.
A paper on AI-induced dehumanization. As we interact with chatbots more often, we also treat humans in a more transactional way.
Your therapist and your coworker can't be the same person.[cq] A chatbot with a single[cr][cs] personality, identity, and memory for your whole life doesn't make sense. (And no, work "therapy" is very different from actual...
Intelligence is not the same as usefulness. In chatbots so far the two were aligned but we've hit diminishing returns because we can't tell the difference in intelligence anymore. Intelligence used to be ...
...uestion is not, "how to do cool open ended things with LLMs." That's easy. As a chatbot, it's trivial. As a thing that can do tool use (and possibly have side effects), it's easy to do for enthusiasts who are willing and able to use the ...
One cynical reason to hide the memory in a chatbot: more stickiness. Illegible state leads to increased stickiness. Harder for users to exit.
...s potential. The current manifestation is the simplest thing you can imagine: a chatbot. But that manifestation is obviously not the end point.