LLMs are like clay.
LLMs are like clay. [ael]Normal programming is like legos. Precise, unyielding, but flexible in combination. LLMs are inherently flexible. For some use ca...
1,749 mentions · 790 chunks · 131 episodes
LLMs are like clay. [ael]Normal programming is like legos. Precise, unyielding, but flexible in combination. LLMs are inherently flexible. For some use ca...
... until after! Even a lot of people in the industry who are thinking a lot about LLMs are implicitly thinking about them as simply a sustaining technology (though they think they're thinking about things disruptively). Disruptive thing...
LLMs are a disruptive innovation that will change the world[afb][afc][afd]. On the same scope of impact as: The printing press Electricity The internet. T...
LLMs are human-level common sense[afl] with infinite patience, many orders of magnitude cheaper than real humans. It's impossible for that to not be disru...
... for gold![afq][afr] Everyone's trying to do the meta play, not just using[afs] LLMs, a new, disruptive input.
... say based on the category they fit in.[afv] A similar test could be applied to LLMs: the novelty of an utterance has to do with the inverse of the likelihood[afw] that that next token would be predicted by the LLM based on the preced...
The power of LLMs comes from humans. Both the background knowledge that makes them smart is from culture[afy]. But also the thing that makes their output good is the q...
LLMs talk to us like they're a human, but they're a collective hive mind of society, presenting as a singular "person". Like the alien in Contact. "I'm as...
...ake work. Many hobbies are very hard to start doing, and hard to get better at. LLMs are great at being an intellectual and creative dance partner, helping you grow in a forgiving environment.[agl][agm] LLMs make it "cheaper" to start...
LLMs allow a new medium for communication. Don't use LLMs to write books. Books are a static communication medium, one-size-fits-all, frozen for all time....
Working with LLMs is like working with a recently tamed animal[agu].
Are you using LLMs right? The test is, are you thinking more or less? If you give its answer directly to others (without curation), you are giving an average, eroding y...
A nice piece from my friend Dimitri about two patterns for using LLMs. One pattern is the open-ended conversation. One is a recipe for generating insight from interactions.
What would an OS look like that took LLMs for granted? Not a patch job on top of the OSes we have today, but a new kind of "OS" that was AI-native, and built in a world that assumed high-qual...
... talking to a person, but talking to the collective hive mind of humanity.[ajm] LLMs give great guacamole recipes, because they've seen every guacamole recipe and can triangulate what they all have in common.
LLMs shouldn't help you do less thinking, they should help you do more thinking[ajn][ajo][ajp] They give you higher leverage. Will that cause you to be sa...
People who think LLMs can't be useful either haven't tried them or aren't curious enough. Curious people (especially ones with a need for cognition[ajv][ajw]) will keep pu...
...ge evaporates. Prompt-fu is the equivalent for getting much better results from LLMs. That implies that people with prompt-fu will get less and less differentiated results as the systems we all use get more mature. But presumably ther...
...y do a surprisingly great job at predicting what a given sequence will fold to. LLMs are tapping into a hidden structure of the universe that reveals itself only if you are patient enough to sift through it.[akb][akc] LLMs are patient...
There are a lot of new techniques to "frack" LLMs to squeeze more out of them. If you get just a single english-language append-only log designed for a human, you make the LLM take its rich understan...