A short read on the topic's time range, peak episode, and strongest associations. Use it as the quick orientation before drilling into examples.
ChatGPT appears in 155 chunks across 67 episodes, from 2024-01-29 to 2026-04-20.
Its densest episode is Bits and Bobs 5/5/25 (2025-05-05), with 6 observations on this topic.
Semantically it travels with llms, OpenAI, and Claude, while by chunk count it sits between Claude and Google; its yearly rank moved from #14 in 2024 to #7 in 2026.
Over time
?
Raw mentions over time. Use this to see absolute attention, not relative rank among all topics.
Range2024-01-29 to 2026-04-20Mean2.3 per episodePeak6 on 2025-05-05
Observations
?
The primary evidence view for this topic. Sort it chronologically when you want concrete examples behind the larger pattern.
Showing 155 observations sorted from latest to earliest.
...use case for users so they can get a sense of what it can do.
Google Search and ChatGPT are two open-ended tools.
But they are both good enough at so many things, that no matter what you do as a first use case, you're likely to have a go...
There's something clear about starting a separate conversation in e.g. ChatGPT
You can see exactly what the LLM sees: what's in the conversation.
You can start a fresh conversation if you want fresh context.
The new ChatGPT memo...
... I!")
A first response that is good and intriguing and invites experimentation.
ChatGPT has social proof of examples of people posting great results and evangelizing them.
People higher on the savviness ladder can help give encouragement...
...r day and help you distill a journal for reflection later.
One way: do a GPT in ChatGPT.
It's easy to do... but no way to export your journal entries anywhere.
They're just stuck in chat transcripts in the system.
Another way: duct tape ...
ChatGPT and LLMs have proven to be more useful to individuals than to companies.
That implies that we're still in the community garden phase, not the factory...
...e.
You're in the loop with the software.
This solves a confusing riddle:
Why is ChatGPT so compelling, but most LLM-powered UIs are underwhelming or hard to trust?
In a ChatGPT conversation, you're in the loop with the LLM; you can see h...
...crap" moment.
OSes do this now with system-level microphone / camera indicator.
ChatGPT's new personal memory feature doesn't do this.
It's possible to ask it to save little memories about you (e.g. "I typically program in Typescript").
...
... concept, it's a good sign that there isn't a clear consensus on it in society.
ChatGPT turns unknown unknowns into known unknowns.
It's useful when you don't even know what questions to ask.
You still don't know the answers, but at leas...
...t other users come to expect to work, too.
When there's a huge first mover like ChatGPT, everyone else will be evaluated on how well they perform on queries optimized for ChatGPT primarily.
If services like Gemini don't do well on those,...
A few stray thoughts on LLMs.
I love using ChatGPT as a kind of family feud "what will the average (X category of person) think about this phrase".
Kind of an automatic wisdom of the crowds.
If you ha...
...bels as cheat codes.
Talking in E-Prime is hard, an intense mental workout.
But ChatGPT is really great at translating a phrase into E-Prime.
It helps you practice doing it, and helps you see where you were accidentally relying on an ove...
ChatGPT doesn't feel like formulating a query, it feels like talking to a human.
Google is extremely impressive at figuring out how to interpret your query.
...
I was talking to a friend who is using ChatGPT in novel ways at his startup.
He is not a chemistry expert, but is now able to consume relevant chemistry papers that previously would have required ...