How much more common this term is here than in ordinary English. Higher values mean the topic is more characteristic of this corpus.
1.5x burst in 2025 Q1?
Peak quarter intensity across the topic's active span. Higher values mean attention was concentrated into a shorter stretch rather than spread evenly over time.
Related:?
Topics that appear in the same chunks as this one. Use this to find semantic neighbors, not ranking neighbors.
A short read on the topic's time range, peak episode, and strongest associations. Use it as the quick orientation before drilling into examples.
llms appears in 790 chunks across 131 episodes, from 2023-11-06 to 2026-08-03.
Its densest episode is Bits and Bobs 10/20/25 (2025-10-20), with 17 observations on this topic.
Semantically it travels with ChatGPT, Claude, and Google, while by chunk count it sits between Claude; its yearly rank moved from #2 in 2023 to #1 in 2026.
Over time
?
Raw mentions over time. Use this to see absolute attention, not relative rank among all topics.
Range2023-11-06 to 2026-08-03Mean6.0 per episodePeak17 on 2025-10-20
Observations
?
The primary evidence view for this topic. Sort it chronologically when you want concrete examples behind the larger pattern.
Showing 790 observations sorted from latest to earliest.
Infinite content and LLMs can create filter bubbles but for your self-perception.
Not only is it finding the content that makes you feel good about what you already believe,[n...
...illion permission dialogs.
The stuff you'd use to contain the prompt injection (LLMs) is the stuff that can be tricked by anything you show.
Turtles all the way down.
"Do you trust this domain to get information from this chat?"
This ...
LLMs are so noisy that it's hard to figure out the quality of underlying components built on top, because the noise dominates the signal.
Did it break bec...
Anthea pointed out to me that LLMs should raise teachers' expectations of what students can accomplish.
One approach to LLMs in education is worrying about the floor.
"How would you ev...
Hill climbing a moving hill doesn't work.
LLMs are moving hills.
The models are still improving rapidly.
Don't over optimize for their current behavior.
LLM companies are trying to get a premature monopoly on LLMs.
We didn't figure out the participatory architecture yet, which is necessary for the early stage of new technologies!
...the web, it formed a larger amount of the LLM context on Scots.
That means that LLMs also likely replicate Scots poorly, all because of one weird bottleneck.
A similar kind of thing happens in evolutionary biology, a "population bottl...
... the worst timeline."
Imagine it for our entire digital lives.
If everyone uses LLMs to cothink, the guardrails they have will shape all of society.
This analysis shows the power of a centralized algorithm that everyone views the worl...
...n it easily.
It's child's play to prevent injection with a bit of escaping.
Now LLMs with tool use allow all data to be executable.
A massive expansion of threat surface area.
So now all of the systems builders are thrust into the wor...
Prompt injection sets the ceiling of potential of LLMs.
Claude and OpenAI will build integrations into chat via things like MCP.
Vibe coders will get stuck making dead end little island apps.
Both will ge...
The unlock for LLMs vs deep learning is they're general purpose.
Deep learning techniques of the mid 2010's relied on supervised learning.
They could do impressive feats...
LLMs are extremely confusable deputies.
In security, one type of vulnerability is the confused deputy.
A powerful entity is tricked into applying their po...
LLMs can make generalists almost as good as specialists in many domains.
The generalist meta-skills of volition, savviness, curiosity are now more importa...
I like the metaphor of sleepwalking geniuses for LLMs.
It captures how powerful they are… and also how silly they can be if you don't constantly guide them.