16 chunks · 12 episodes
A resonant privacy model allows you to have minimal friction, but safely. At each layer, you don't have to peel it back and understand the layer beneath. But if you did, you'...
...nted. Software today is overwhelming precisely because it is expensive, and its privacy model requires you to think about who created it, at least implicitly.
...de can execute, you presume it can also communicate across the network. So your privacy model reduces to "what code is allowed to execute." But if it were possible to prove "this code executes, but no information about it can ever be communica...
A single use case with a more thoughtful privacy model would have a hard time selling customers on it. They'd have to convince those customers about how their service is architected differently and why th...
...vacy, but holistically[oe]: The business model. The technical architecture. The privacy model. Everyone should have a Private Intelligence that works only for them, and is entirely aligned with their interests.
...lly your turf, no one else's, and fully under your control. It would need a new privacy model for third parties to do useful things with data without leaking information. It would need to be an open, decentralized system so it could be ubiquit...
.... A personal "operating system". To do it properly would require a bullet proof privacy model.
...y well, it's the "single entity in control." That's required due to our default privacy model, the easiest way to safely share data is to have a single entity in control Because when data crosses a legal entity's boundaries that's dangerous an...
...t a non-consensus swarm of unknown actors to see your data. What if there was a privacy model that allowed the non-consensus swarm to build things with your data, safely?
...it that you trust? What do you do if the system betrays your trust? Our current privacy model also assumes that all of your data goes to one entity who has a lot of power over that data… which isn't viable with an anonymous swarm of untrusted ...
...much in practice because users don't read them and they are non-negotiable. The privacy model is handled implicitly outside the core model. It's safe to install an app, but scary to deeply engage with one. This gives you a cold start problem, ...
...we literally can't imagine anything else It colors all of our assumptions about privacy models (and thus the horizon of viable experiences) for everything. But this universe is approaching its heat death. All of the interesting things possible...
...uanced model that makes everything provably private by default. By flipping the privacy model on its head, you create the potential for transcending the limitations of the current web/app paradigm. The right privacy laws of physics + AI = a bi...
Mass market users almost never think about security or privacy models. What's the last time you thought about the same-origin model, the fundamental model that underlies the web and modern apps' laws of physics? The in...
...u. But if you change the laws of physics so services come to you, and there's a privacy model that allows safe speculative execution, then all of that changes. Imagine: every service you interact with is perfectly personalized to you, but also...
...experiences that are possible within it… which are only possible because of the privacy model. The killer use case of this new platform will be the whole universe of amazing things that aren't viable in other systems. A privacy model does not ...