Topic: coordination cost

42 chunks · 32 episodes

Topic summary

?
A short read on the topic's time range, peak episode, and strongest associations. Use it as the quick orientation before drilling into examples.
  • coordination cost appears in 42 chunks across 32 episodes, from 2023-10-02 to 2026-04-13.
  • Its densest episode is Bits and Bobs 4/6/26 (2026-04-06), with 4 observations on this topic.
  • Semantically it travels with vast majority, schelling point, and Google, while by chunk count it sits between Saruman and downside risk; its yearly rank moved from #12 in 2023 to #21 in 2026.

Over time

?
Raw mentions over time. Use this to see absolute attention, not relative rank among all topics.
Mean 1.3 mentions per episode across the full range2023-10-02: 1 mention2023-10-30: 1 mention2023-11-13: 1 mention2023-12-04: 1 mention2024-02-12: 3 mentions2024-03-18: 1 mention2024-04-01: 1 mention2024-04-08: 1 mention2024-05-13: 1 mention2024-05-27: 1 mention2024-06-03: 1 mention2024-08-12: 1 mention2024-09-16: 1 mention2024-09-30: 1 mention2024-10-28: 1 mention2024-11-04: 1 mention2025-01-21: 1 mention2025-01-27: 1 mention2025-02-18: 1 mention2025-04-28: 2 mentions2025-05-05: 1 mention2025-06-02: 1 mention2025-06-09: 2 mentions2025-09-08: 2 mentions2025-09-29: 1 mention2025-10-20: 1 mention2025-12-15: 1 mention2026-01-19: 2 mentions2026-03-17: 1 mention2026-03-30: 1 mention2026-04-06: 4 mentions2026-04-13: 2 mentions2023-10-02: 12023-10-30: 12023-11-13: 12023-12-04: 12024-02-12: 32024-03-18: 12024-04-01: 12024-04-08: 12024-05-13: 12024-05-27: 12024-06-03: 12024-08-12: 12024-09-16: 12024-09-30: 12024-10-28: 12024-11-04: 12025-01-21: 12025-01-27: 12025-02-18: 12025-04-28: 22025-05-05: 12025-06-02: 12025-06-09: 22025-09-08: 22025-09-29: 12025-10-20: 12025-12-15: 12026-01-19: 22026-03-17: 12026-03-30: 12026-04-06: 42026-04-13: 22023-10-022026-04-13

Observations

?
The primary evidence view for this topic. Sort it chronologically when you want concrete examples behind the larger pattern.

Small companies can be crazy and fast.

from Bits and Bobs 1/27/25 ·

...use they have no downside, only upside. Fast because they have practically zero coordination costs. Sometimes crazy is how you break through to the next thing. The vast majority of crazy, fast companies are like sparks flying through the wind, snu...

Why are applications the current "size"?

from Bits and Bobs 9/30/24 ·

...Coasian theory of the app. That is, the app size is determined partially by the coordination cost of integrating your app with another party's system. Code is unforgiving; when two systems need to interact it's like finely machined gears that have...

Everyone assumes bigger is better.

from Bits and Bobs 6/3/24 ·

...e you more likely to die: More sclerotic. Harder to coordinate and adapt, since coordination costs rise superlinearly with size. Trapped by a Lilliputian web. More leverage. Leverage allows efficiency… but also more risk. If the underlying source ...

Too many resources can smother a thing.

from Bits and Bobs 4/8/24 ·

...ources can smother a thing. They create eddy currents of possibility. Swirls of coordination costs. Instead of focused, laminar flow, you get turbulent flow. It's much harder for anything to cohere and then be built on top of.

Big organizations are fundamentally hard.

from Bits and Bobs 4/1/24 ·

...he problem is the people being lazy or incompetent. The problem is the inherent coordination cost scaling super-linearly., a law of physics. There are ideas that are so big that they can't be done inside a company, where everyone can veto. Large o...

Boulders are obvious obstacles from a distance.

from Bits and Bobs 2/12/24 ·

... isn't one. There's a swarm of small issues, each of which requires independent coordination costs to chase down, convincing tons of different teams to do a thing that isn't a priority for them." "Hmm, have you tried simply being more bold?" You c...

Everything by default diffuses.

from Bits and Bobs 12/4/23 ·

...t step (coordination) has super-linear costs. So sometimes it's best to pay the coordination cost once for a big boulder, but at the cost of adaptability / resilience. This "small number of pivots" logic is the "big rig" style of organizations.